GOODWORKS RESEARCH STUDY PROJECTS
Independent research studies of lightwork in real-life application participated collectively by volunteers in different cultures and jointly studied to daily help others and provide findings to facilitate development of super-senses both for the individual lightworkers and in tandem with research
These are the overviews of the four daily research-study project followed by overview of Quantum Intuition and then the specific questions for each type of case.
A. RESEARCH STUDY PROJECTS:
1. CHILDFINDERS
Daily 3 teams and individual Intuitives give insight on one missing children's case that is summarized to show the significant consensus of the 25 key questions and all useful specifics that are database searchable
2. GLOBALWATCH
Daily individual Intuitives give insight on global concerns that is summarized to show the significant consensus of type of global concern, latitude, longitude, time of day and useful specifics that are database searchable
3. HEALING CIRCLE
Daily individual Healin-Energy-Workers send healin-energy to one person who report changes daily for the next seven days, usually with medical valuation/documentation before and after; participants evaluate what works best for specific dis-ease and healin-energy tips for both senders and receivers
4. SUPERSENSES
Daily individual Intuitives give insight on one of three specific focuses of super-senses: remote-viewing, medical-intuition and aura-scans that is then evaluated on known factors and the significant consensus of unknown factors
a. REMOTE-VIEWING
Individual Remote-Viewers submit insight ("signals") on a specific target referenced by target#; one target a week has mostly known factors and one target a week has a balance of known and unknown factors
b. MEDICAL-INTUITION
Individual Medical Intuitives submit insight on a specific subject-volunteer referenced by first-name, last initial, age and city; one subject-volunteer a week has mostly known factors and one subject-volunteer a week has a balance of known and unknown factors
c. AURA-SCANS
Individual Aura-Scanners submit insight on a specific subject-volunteer referenced by first-name, last initial, age and city; one subject-volunteer a week has mostly known factors and one subject-volunteer a week has a balance of known and unknown factors with in both the priority to define the consensus of aura-scan perception of a specific dis-ease by specific factors and drawings
5. PREDICTIONS AND FORECASTS
Daily individual Intuitives give predictions on anything and include dates or time-frames (and indicate what would determine it's accuracy and inaccuracy subjectively if prediction is not objectively black/white). Predictions are evaluated on accuracy with weighting for specificity, usefulness and counter-logicalness.
B. FINDINGS, EVALUATION, EXTERNAL EXPERTS AND CERTFICATION
Findings: Each daily research-studies projects' findings are published on the site with reference-numbers replacing identity of subjects and any reference to specific participants to protect their privacy. Everyone is encouraged to make their own conclusions from the findings and publish them on the site and independently.
Evaluation: We primarily evaluate the findings with the known factors and consensus of unknown factors as a first-step in the research and benefit to both subjects and participants. The final evaluation of results is determined by a balance of external experts and public epoll and forum.
External Experts: Anyone with documented expertise in evaluation of innovative research studies can give their conclusion of the findings. This is presented in balance of the public epoll, the participants surveys and subjects surveys.
Certification: We do not specifically certify anyone's super-sense ability as no matter how accurate a specific Intuitive is for everyone else, everyone would want to individually discern their accuracy for them. We do certify the documentation of their ability is accurate from what insight they send to us to be documented (time/date-stamped) in reference to the known and unknown factors of the case. An emblem and certificate can be provided which denotes the number of cases the participant has documented, the accuracy documented (and also helpfulness and group-support).
C. COPYRIGHT AND RELEASE FOR REPRODUCTION, PUBLICATION AND SALE
Copyright: Copyright of all findings is maintained to protect the integrity of the findings so they can not be edited or altered in any way. The copyright does not limit anyone's ability to reproduce, publish or sell the findings in full as-is with any commentary.
Release: Anyone can request a specific release to reproduce, publish and sell the findings unaltered in full as-is with any commentary.
D. QUANTUM INTUITION
Quantum Intuition is the process of independent Intuitives giving insight on specific questions about one case (or subject) so that the significant consensus of the group on the key questions and a listing by significance of the useful specifics. Findings of the significant consensus and significant useful specifics are reported with identities protected by reference number and any consensus details and specifics about criminal cases not reported publically until closed by authorities. Evaluation of known factors is reported as accuracy and evaluation of unknown factors to consensus is reported as clarity.
Independent Intuitives: Intuitives from beginning to advanced can all equally participate in the research-study projects once or daily. Participation can be in teams or individually what are considered each equal one in the consensus and the insight is given by epoll to facilitate reportings of findings. Anyone requesting to be documented sends their insight (team or individual) also to an email account with "return read request" for time/day-stamp of delivery.
Specific Key Questions: Key questions are submitted by participants, subject-volunteers, external experts and the public and once a quarter (every 12 weeks), current and new questions are reviewed and voted on by all. Between the quarterly voting, additional insight not applicable to one of the key questions can be given in "Additional Specifics" if useful and often if how the validility of additional questions is determined best.
Consensus: Consensus is determined by the majority of insight above chance.
Significant: Significance is determined by what the most relevant science determines as applicable, such as 30% above chance for consensus and two or more independent Intuitives for useful specifics.
Useful Specifics: Useful specifics are defined as what would be able to be used effectively by the subject-volunteer (or authorities in a crime) in real-life application now.
CHILDFINDERS
Cases are determined from NCMEC by:
1. Amber Alerts that day
then from current to previous:
2. nonfamily-abduction
3. endangered missing
4. family abductions with felony warrant
5. endangered runaways 15 and under
usually there are at least one a day of the above, when there are not, other cases are considered.
These cases above are posted daily on the site and emailed to all participates. Amber alerts are additionally sent by cellphone-text-message to anyone who asks.
For the best consensus of the most accurate tips, the three teams for each day rotate each picking the case for that day based on the above priorities that the other two teams and any individual Intuitives do for that day. When there is not sufficient pool of Intuitives to produce a significant consensus, the insight is still sent to the authorities with a notation that it is primarily collective individual insight and not representing the significance of probability above chance from an adequate pool. Anyone can use the ChildFinders protocol and format to work on other cases at any time and independently submit the insight to the authorities.
Specific questions:
A. Location of child now:
1. Direction from "reported last seen" (pick one or two)?
a. N
b. S
c. E
d. W
2. Distance from "reported last seen" (pick one and include any specific distance)?
a. within 1mi
b. 1-10mi
c. 11-100mi
d. over 100mi
3. Still moving (not this very moment but within the day or next day)?
a. in transit/traveling
b. not being moved for now, kept in one place
4. Seen in current location by someone the police can interview (whether that person recognized them or not at the time)
a. has been seen by someone in that area (please describe who and where specifically and when)
b. has not been seen by someone in that area, kept totally hidden
5. Type of building or outside (please describe outside material and color):
a. residence (house, apartment)
b. commercial (business, industrial)
c. outside
6. Area, in proximity to the center of the nearest city (town or metropolitan area)?
a. city or industrial
b. suburb or residential
c. rural
please specifically describe all destinctive landmarks in the area
7. First letter of street name and any house/property numbers (then give full-name and/or "sounds-like")?
8. First letter of city/town (then give full-name and/or "sounds-like")?
9. Additional specifics that are useful (those that a detective can find on foot or by car or by database-search)?
B. Abductor (or person most related if not an abduction):
If more than one person is involved, then everyone pick the one person most able to be found that will be able to lead the authorities to the child.
1. Relation to child (very important question so please use given definitions rather than your labels)?
a. unknown (has never met)
b. known (would recognize)
c. well-known (interacts with)
d. close (regular interaction)
2. Ethnicity (in appearance)?
a. white
b. black
c. hispanic
d. middle-eastern
e. oriental
3. Height (include exact height if possible)?
a. shorter than 5'10"
b. 5'10" to 6'0"
c. over 6'0"
4. Weight (include exact weight if possible)?
a. average (160-190lbs)
b. heavy (over 190lbs)
c. thin (under 160lbs)
5. Hair (in appearance whether natural color or not)?
a. black
b. brown
c. blonde
d. red
e. grey
f. bald
6. Eyes?
a. blue
b. brown
c. green
d. hazel
7. Age (legal age whether they appear that age or not and include specific age if possible)?
a. 20's
b. 30's
c. 40's
d. 50's and above
8. First letter of first and last name (then give full-name and/or "sounds-like")?
9. Body markings (describe area of body and shape/design)?
a. scars
b. tattos
c. birthmarks
10. Type of work (include first letter of last company/business worked for then give full-name and/or "sounds-like")?
a. manual
b. trade
c. administrative
d. sales
e. managerial
f. professional
11. Auto (include specific make or model if possible)?
a. light color
b. medium color
c. dark color
d. 2-door
e. 4-door
f. new
g. 2-5yrs-old
h. over 5yrs-old
12. Plates (color of letters and background, state, symbol, design and any letter/numbers)?
13. Regular associations (specific names and locations)?
a. sports/recreation
b. bar/restaurant
c. clubs/groups
14. Paper trail including recent purchases (specific what, where and when)?
a. perscriptions
b. registrations
c. licenses
d. rentals
e. repairs
f . unusual purchases
15. Person close to Abductor who may know or be susicious?
a. relation to abductor
b. first letter of first and last name (then give full-name and/or "sounds-like")?
16. Additional specifics that are useful (those that a detective can find on foot or by car or by database-search)?
GLOBALWATCH:
Global concerns are defined as:
1. severe weather
2. severe crime spree
3. domestic uprising
4. international conflict
5. terrorism
with latitude, longitude, time of day and any useful specifics.
HEALING CIRCLE
Cases are determined by:
1. inoperable dis-ease with recent medical documentation and willing to document medical status in seven days
2. chronic pain with recent medical documentation and willing to document medical status in seven days
3. any specific dis-ease with recent medical documentation and willing to document medical status in seven days
usually there are at least one a day of the above, when there are not, other cases are considered.
Specific questions for the subject-volunteer to answer before the HealingCircle:
1. What is the medical diagnosis of your current condition and when was it diagnosed?
2. What measure of symptoms or condition have you had and what are the results?
3. What other health issues are you having, how long for each and 1-10 for each of their severity of symptoms?
4. What medications and therapies are you currently, how long for each and 1-10 for each of their effectiveness?
Specific questions for the subject-volunteer to answer daily for seven days:
1. For any measure of symptoms or condition, what are the results and any change?
2. For each health issue, rate each 1-10 for severity of symptoms and any change?
3. For any medications and therapies, rate each 1-10 for each of their effectiveness and any change?
SUPER-SENSES REMOTE-VIEWING:
Targets are determined by one of each per week:
1. target with primarily known factors
2. target with a balance of known and unknown factors
Specific questions:
1. Ideogram:
a. curving upward
b. curving downward
c. curving around
d. curving under
e. slanting downward
f. slanting upward
g. horizontal
h. vertical
i. angling back
j. peaking
k. jagged
l. wavering
m. wavy
2. Firmness/density:
a. hard
b. semi-hard
c. semi-soft
d. soft
e. mushy
f. wet
3. Surface features:
a. round
b. flat
c. pointed
d. convoluted
4. Basic attributes:
a. natural
b. manmade
c. biological
d. movement
e. energetics
5. Basic physical:
a. object
b. structure
c. subject
d. subjects
e. land
f. city
g. mountain
h. water
6. Ideogram:
a. curving upward
b. curving downward
c. curving around
d. curving under
e. slanting downward
f. slanting upward
g. horizontal
h. vertical
i. angling back
j. peaking
k. jagged
l. wavering
m. wavy
SUPER-SENSES MEDICAL-INTUITION:
Cases are determined by:
1. inoperable dis-ease with recent medical documentation and willing to document medical status in seven days
2. chronic pain with recent medical documentation and willing to document medical status in seven days
3. any specific dis-ease with recent medical documentation and willing to document medical status in seven days
usually there are at least one a day of the above, when there are not, other cases are considered.
Specific questions:
1. Duration:
a. temporal (days/weeks)
b. continual (months/1-2years)
c. life-path (2+ years)
2. Severity:
a. temporary
b. impairment
c. critical
d. imminent
3. Body-system:
a. skeletal
b. muscular
c. lymphatic
d. endocrine
e. nervous
f. circulatory
g. digestive
h. reproductive
i. immune
j. senses
k. respatory
4. Source of imbalance
a. genetics
b. self-attitude/belief
c. environment
d. diet
e. natural aging
5. Key insight about imbalance:
6. Most effective remedy:
a. medical
b. alternative
c. healin-energy work
d. diet
e. environment
f. physical therapy
7. % of self or external change:
8. Insight for issue processing:
9. Insight for new patterns and/or boundaries:
10. Any other specifics about subject-volunteer:
SUPER-SENSES AURA-SCANS:
Cases are determined by:
1. inoperable disease with recent medical documentation and willing to document medical status in seven days
2. pain with recent medical documentation and willing to document medical status in seven days
3. any specific dis-ease with recent medical documentation and willing to document medical status in seven days
usually there are at least one a day of the above, when there are not, other cases are
Specific questions:
1. Size (outside body):
a. 1-4 inches
b. 6-12 inches
c. 12+ inches
2. Shape:
a. body-glove
b. egg-shere
c. emmanating
3. Vibration:
a. low
b. average
c. high
4. Flow:
a. weak
b. full
c. bathed
5. Expansion:
a. none/little
b. 50%
c. 100%
6. Magnification:
a. none/little
b. 50-100%
c. 100-200%
7. Overdominant colors or densities:
a. purple
b. violet
c. blue
d. green
e. yellow
f. orange
g. red
h. brown
i. gray
j. white
8. Missing colors or leaks:
a. purple
b. violet
c. blue
d. green
e. yellow
f. orange
g. red
h. brown
i. gray
j. white
9. Most significant insight:
10. Most significant remedy:
PREDICTIONS:
1. specific prediction
2. date or range of time outcome predicted
(if prediction is not objectively black/white, indicate what would determine it's accuracy and inaccuracy subjectively)
SPECIFIC FOCUS-GROUPS OR PRESENTATIONS FOR EACH STUDY:
1. Yahoo- ongoing discussion on tips by participants
2. MSN- msg bd for each case discussion
3. Topica- public discussion of findings
4. Google/Usenet- public presentation of findings
5. ICQ- public presentation of findings for foreign language translation
6. AOL- for press-releases and media-kit
7. online- classes on tips, discussion groups and team-participation
8. local- classes on tips, discussion groups and team-participation
9. conventions/expos- public presentation of findings with interactive case-studies
10. radio/tv- public presentation of findings with interactive case-studies
SPECIAL CERTIFICATIONS:
Special certifications are also available for aspects of the support of the research findings. Those who have done one of these tasks three times, can apply to be certified.
1. Lead
2. Summarizer
3. Master-Consensus
4. Evaluator
5. Researcher
6. Writer of findings
7. Presenter of findings
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS:
We present the findings in full as-is with no uniform conclusion and allow each presenter to include their own conclusion. Accuracy can be presented for the overall findings for each case and study informally and any individual can present their own accuracy which they can also note if it is certified. Formal presentation accuracy is presented by external experts not directly participating in the studies. Results of any of the study is presented only by the subject-volunteer (or authorities in a crime) or a released quote from correspondence with them.
